Kontakto

SKJ Systems Ltd Oy

Aktiivinen
Business ID 0869218-7
|
VAT-number FI08692187

SKJ Systems Ltd Oy (0869218-7)

Sammonkatu 12

70500 KUOPIO

Description

SKJ Systems Ltd Oy (0869218-7) is a limited company founded in 1991, located in Kuopio. Its main industry is Ohjelmistojen suunnittelu ja valmistus.

Info

Official name:

SKJ Systems Ltd Oy

Company form:

Osakeyhtiö

Year of foundation:

1991

Domicile city:

Kuopio

Official language:

Suomi

Industry:

Ohjelmistojen suunnittelu ja valmistus

Official address:

Sammonkatu 12, 70500 KUOPIO

VAT ID:

FI08692187

Source: PRH & YTJ

Information updates automatically
Kontakto Oy does not charge companies for being listed or for updating their information. If you have any questions, please contact support@kontakto.fi.

Website

Technologies were detected automatically from the site.

Kotisivukamu

Is SKJ Systems Ltd Oy your company? Kotisivukamu can build a new site from your current content in about half an hour.

Renew the site with Kotisivukamu →

E-invoicing addresses

E-invoicing addresses are only available for registered users. Sign-up is free of charge.

Active registrations

5 in force
  • Arvonlisäverorekisteri Verohallinto Registered: 30.3.2001 In force
  • Ennakkoperintärekisteri Verohallinto Registered: 16.3.2017 In force
  • Kaupparekisteri PRH Registered: 15.1.1992 In force
  • Työnantajarekisteri Verohallinto Registered: 30.3.2001 In force
  • Verohallinnon perustiedot Verohallinto Registered: 20.4.2026 In force

Source: PRH & Finnish Tax Administration (YTJ)

Interface usage

Would you like this data directly in your billing system?

By integrating Kontakto, you get up-to-date company information lightning fast to your own system.

Using the interface is fast and easy. Subscribe now and start integrating!

READ MORE

Info & Feedback

Data source

PRH & YTJ

Company information is collected from public registers and updated regularly. Data may be subject to delays.

Read more on our FAQ page

Spotted an error?

Let us know if any information seems incorrect. We will look into it.