Kontakto

Tampereen G-Master Ky

Aktiivinen
Business ID 0640166-5
|
VAT-number FI06401665

Tampereen G-Master Ky (0640166-5)

Käpykuja 4

37470 VESILAHTI

Description

Tampereen G-Master Ky (0640166-5) is a limited partnership founded in 1986, located in Tampere. Its main industry is Metallirakenteiden ja niiden osien valmistus.

Info

Official name:

Tampereen G-Master Ky

Company form:

Kommandiittiyhtiö

Year of foundation:

1986

Domicile city:

Tampere

Official language:

Suomi

Industry:

Metallirakenteiden ja niiden osien valmistus

Official address:

Käpykuja 4, 37470 VESILAHTI

VAT ID:

FI06401665

Source: PRH & YTJ

Information updates automatically
Kontakto Oy does not charge companies for being listed or for updating their information. If you have any questions, please contact support@kontakto.fi.

Website

Kotisivukamu

Is Tampereen G-Master Ky your company?

We couldn't find a website for it. Kotisivukamu builds one with AI in about half an hour, prices from €3.90/month.

Create a website →

E-invoicing addresses

E-invoicing addresses are only available for registered users. Sign-up is free of charge.

Active registrations

5 in force
  • Arvonlisäverorekisteri Verohallinto Registered: 30.3.2001 In force
  • Ennakkoperintärekisteri Verohallinto Registered: 28.2.2017 In force
  • Kaupparekisteri PRH Registered: 25.3.1987 In force
  • Työnantajarekisteri Verohallinto Registered: 31.3.2009 In force
  • Verohallinnon perustiedot Verohallinto Registered: 3.4.2026 In force

Source: PRH & Finnish Tax Administration (YTJ)

Interface usage

Would you like this data directly in your billing system?

By integrating Kontakto, you get up-to-date company information lightning fast to your own system.

Using the interface is fast and easy. Subscribe now and start integrating!

READ MORE

Info & Feedback

Data source

PRH & YTJ

Company information is collected from public registers and updated regularly. Data may be subject to delays.

Read more on our FAQ page

Spotted an error?

Let us know if any information seems incorrect. We will look into it.