Kontakto

Maatalousyhtymä Hietala Jari ja Juha

Aktiivinen
Business ID 2589714-1
|
VAT-number FI25897141

Maatalousyhtymä Hietala Jari ja Juha (2589714-1)

Kappelintie 124

69410 SYKÄRÄINEN

Contact details

Phone number not declared.

Visiting address not declared.

Email not declared.

No website on record.

Description

Maatalousyhtymä Hietala Jari ja Juha (2589714-1) is a tax consortium founded in 2013, located in Toholampi. Its main industry is Yhdistetty kasvinviljely ja kotieläintalous.

Info

Official name:

Maatalousyhtymä Hietala Jari ja Juha

Company form:

Verotusyhtymä

Year of foundation:

2013

Domicile city:

Toholampi

Official language:

Suomi

Industry:

Yhdistetty kasvinviljely ja kotieläintalous

Official address:

Kappelintie 124, 69410 SYKÄRÄINEN

Source: PRH & YTJ

Information updates automatically
Kontakto Oy never calls anyone and never asks for money to correct or update information. We also never send unexpected invoices. If someone contacts you or you receive an invoice in our name, it is a scam. You can contact us at support@kontakto.fi, but we will never reach out to ask for anything.
UUTTA
Kotisivukamu

Does your business need a website?

Kontakto's new Kotisivukamu service builds your business a professional website in 30 minutes - no technical skills needed.

Try for free →

E-invoicing addresses

E-invoicing addresses are only available for registered users. Sign-up is free of charge.

Registers

Arvonlisäverorekisteri 7.1.2014
Ennakkoperintärekisteri 18.2.2017
Verohallinnon perustiedot 8.11.2024

Interface usage

Would you like this data directly in your billing system?

By integrating Kontakto, you get up-to-date company information lightning fast to your own system.

Using the interface is fast and easy. Subscribe now and start integrating!

READ MORE

Info & Feedback

Data source

PRH & YTJ

Company information is collected from public registers and updated regularly. Data may be subject to delays.

Read more on our FAQ page

Spotted an error?

Let us know if any information seems incorrect. We will look into it.